FX resource consumption vs. sends and buses >>
Forum

Forum



SearchSearch   Users   Registration   Entrance
Today: 02.09.2025 - 18:42:07
Pages:  1  

FX resource consumption vs. sends and buses

Advertising


MessageAuthor

if you go from 24 to 12 effects like you describe you will cut the ressources spent on fx in half...the sends themselves shouldnt have a noticeable effect on the cpu load..

---------------------------
Audi S4 '04 Im A Confused Lunatic Racing Down The Street!

Redundant

users




Statistics:
Messages: 150
Registration: 05.31.2002
24.08.21 - 20:14:02
Message # 1
RE: FX resource consumption vs. sends and buses

Thought so, but wasn`t sure about adding additional tracks having significant effect on efficiency. Thanks!

---------------------------

brokeazz

users




Statistics:
Messages: 507
Registration: 07.28.2003
24.08.21 - 20:22:33
Message # 2
RE: FX resource consumption vs. sends and buses

no problem...you can check the performance meter and a/b the two schemes if you want to know the exact difference.

---------------------------
(CURRENT)'05 Mercedes-Benz C55 AMG Car: Alabaster White

SDSilverM3

users




Statistics:
Messages: 263
Registration: 02.27.2001
24.08.21 - 20:31:46
Message # 3
RE: FX resource consumption vs. sends and buses
Divx 5 Performance based on CPU Speed Comparison : Previous topicNext topic: Dolby Digital & DTS 6.1 ?
Pages:  1  

Message
Name
Message

Click on the dot next to the name to address the participant

           
   
The administrator has prohibited guests from replying to messages! To register, follow the link: register


Participants